Sustainable Inland Transport Connectivity Indicators basic_page_transport_mode Rail Road Rail IWW Economic Sustainability Social Sustainability Environmental Sustainability 2-EC-1.1: Staff resources at rail BCPs and inland clearance stations Show details Adequacy of the number of personnel at rail border crossing points (BCPs) and inland clearance stations to cope with the freight volumes involved. Staff categories include Customs, border guards/police, Health and Safety Executive, State Veterinary Office, State Plant Health Protection Agency, Public Health Agency, Food and Drug Administration, Service for Foreigners’ Affairs, National Revenue Services, Vehicle and Operators Services Agency, and Department of Transport. All staff categories available 24/7 at most BCPs and inland clearance stations: 10 points 10pts Some staff categories available 24/7 at most BCPs and inland clearance stations: 8 points 8pts All staff categories available during office hours at most BCPs and inland clearance stations: 6 points 6pts Some staff categories available during office hours at most BCPs and inland clearance stations: 4 points 4pts Staff available only with appointment: 2 points 2pts No staff at BCPs and inland clearance stations: 0 point 0pts Not applicable N/A 2-EC-1.2: BCP infrastructure (Joint controls facilities) Show details Availability and opening hours of joint controls facilities at rail border crossing points (BCPs) open for international goods traffic. It concerns facilities for domestic controls as well as joint controls with adjoining countries. In terms of opening hours, Article 6 of the Annex 8 to the Harmonization Convention sets out 24 hours a day as a minimum requirement. Facilities for joint bilateral controls with the adjoining country (one-stop technology) are available 24 hours a day: 10 points 10pts Facilities for joint domestic controls (one-stop technology/ 2 stop border post) are available 24 hours a day: 8 points 8pts Facilities for either joint bilateral controls or domestic controls are available with limited opening hours (for example, no night, weekend and holidays operation): 6 points 6pts No facilities for any type of joint controls: 0 point 0pts Not applicable N/A 2-EC-1.3: Harmonization of international standards for minimum useful siding length Show details Harmonization of international standards for minimum useful siding length on main international lines for goods trains. In the Agreement on Main International Railway Lines (AGC), this has been set at 750 m and in Arab Mashreq 500 m. Applicable on more than 50% of the international railway lines along the national segment: 10 points 10pts Applicable on less than 50% of the international railway lines along the national segment: 5 points 5pts Not applicable in the country: 0 points 0pts 2-EC-1.4: Inland clearance and control procedures Show details The extent to which control procedures are undertaken at inland clearance stations away from the border to promote efficient movements at border crossing points (BCPs). The control procedures are involving medico-sanitary inspection, controls of compliance with technical standards, quality controls, train inspections and other as applicable. The adoption of customs risk management system will get additional points as risk management procedures expedite the clearance of goods. All control procedures take place at inland clearance stations: 8 points 8pts >50% control procedures take place at inland clearance stations: 6 points 6pts <50% control procedures take place at inland clearance stations: 4 points 4pts All control procedures take place at BCPs: 0 point 0pts Not applicable N/A Application of customs risk management system: additional 2 points 2-EC-1.5a: Coordination and delegation of controls among national border agencies Show details The extent to which national border agencies (such as Health and Safety Authorities, Treasury, and Food and Drug Administration) delegate their control activities to other border agencies such as Customs authorities, in accordance with a cooperation agreement or memorandum of understanding. By implementing a delegation mechanism, duplication and overlapping activities, and conflicting instructions and requirements can be reduced. A coordination and delegation mechanism is in place where all border agencies can at any time act/perform controls on each other’s behalf: 10 points 10pts A coordination and delegation mechanism is in place, however only several border agencies can in specific cases (e.g. during off-peak hours and at night) act/perform controls on each other’s behalf: 6 points 6pts No coordination and delegation mechanism in place, as such all government agencies act independently: 0 point 0pts Not applicable N/A 2-EC-1.5b: Coordination and delegation of controls between agencies of neighboring countries Show details The extent to which border agencies from both sides of the border crossing point (BCP) coordinate with each other or delegate the control procedures to each other at a designated single common border post/station, in accordance with a bilateral agreement or memorandum of understanding). Implementing such a coordination and delegation mechanism will increase the border crossing efficiency. A coordination and delegation mechanism is in place, where border agencies from both sides of the BCP at any time act/perform controls together or on each other’s behalf: 8 points 8pts A coordination and delegation mechanism is in place, where border agencies from both sides of the BCP in specific cases (e.g. during off-peak hours and at night) act/perform controls jointly or on each other’s behalf: 6 points 6pts No coordination and delegation mechanism in place, as such border agencies from both sides of the BCP act independently: 0 point 0pts Not applicable N/A Common open hours as determined by traffic volume: additional 2 points 2-EC-1.6: Average railway border clearance time Show details The average border processing time (in minutes) needed by a train, calculated by summing the stop time of all trains divided by the number of trains crossing the border per day. The survey should capture the stop time by time of day (peak and off-peak) and day of week. Not applicable. This is a verification indicator. N/A 2-EC-1.7: Proportion of bulk to non-bulk cargo Show details The proportion of bulk to non-bulk export rail cargo from the country. This indicator shows how diverse the rail traffic is, in order to promote non-bulk goods on railways. 50:50 : 10 points 10pts 60:40 : 7 points 7pts 70:30 : 4 points 4pts 80:20 : 0 point 0pts Not applicable N/A 2-EC-1.8: Empty running percentage Show details The empty running percentage of railway traffic returning to the country. This indicator measures cooperation and coordination with neighbouring countries to reduce empty running. Not applicable. This is a verification indicator. N/A 2-EC-2.1a: Average border clearance time (with physical inspection) Show details The average border clearance time (in minutes) needed by a train, when physical inspections are involved. It is calculated by summing the clearance time of all inspected trains divided by the number of inspected trains. Time taken into consideration is the time from entering the border post in one territory to leaving it in the other country. The survey should capture the clearance time by time of day (peak and off-peak) and day of week. Not applicable. This is a verification indicator. N/A 2-EC-2.1b: Average border clearance time (without physical inspection) Show details The average border clearance time (in minutes) needed by a train, when no physical inspections are involved. It is calculated by summing the clearance time of all surveyed trains divided by the number of surveyed trains. Time taken into consideration is the time from entering the border post in one territory to leaving it in the other country. The survey should capture the clearance time by time of day (peak and off-peak) and day of week. Not applicable. This is a verification indicator. N/A 2-EC-2.2: Average queuing time Show details The average queuing time (in minutes) for trains at border stations. Time taken into consideration starts when a train arrives at the rail yard and ends when the clearance process starts. The survey should capture queuing time by time of day (peak and off-peak) and day of week. Not applicable. This is a verification indicator. N/A 2-EC-3.1: Customs clearance cost for containerized cargo Show details The average customs operation cost per Twenty Equipment Unit (TEU) associated with compliance with customs regulations and border crossing procedures in the country relative to the average cost in the region. The involved costs include loading/unloading of shipment at border crossing points and inspection charges. Notes: - “Region” should be defined as a group of countries that are engaged in economic cooperation such as, for example, the Southern African Development Community. Cost is more than 50% lower than the regional average: 10 points 10pts Cost is less than 50% lower than the regional average: 7 points 7pts Cost is less than 50% higher than the regional average: 4 points 4pts Cost is more than 50% higher than the regional average: 0 point 0pts Not applicable N/A 2-EC-3.2: Customs clearance cost for dry bulk cargo Show details The average customs operation cost for dry bulk cargo per ton associated with compliance with customs regulations and border crossing procedures in the country relative to the average cost in the region. The involved costs are, among others, loading/unloading of shipment at border crossing points and inspection charges. Notes: - “Region” should be defined as a group of countries that are engaged in economic cooperation such as, for example, the Southern African Development Community. Cost is more than 50% lower than the regional average: 10 points 10pts Cost is less than 50% lower than the regional average: 7 points 7pts Cost is less than 50% higher than the regional average: 4 points 4pts Cost is more than 50% higher than the regional average: 0 point 0pts Not applicable N/A 2-EC-3.3: Customs clearance cost for liquid bulk cargo Show details The average customs operation cost for liquid bulk cargo per ton associated with compliance with customs regulations and border crossing procedures in the country relative to the average cost in the region. The involved costs are, among others, loading/unloading of shipment at BCPs and inspection charges. Notes: - “Region” should be defined as a group of countries that are engaged in economic cooperation such as, for example, the Southern African Development Community. Cost is more than 50% lower than the regional average: 10 points 10pts Cost is less than 50% lower than the regional average: 7 points 7pts Cost is less than 50% higher than the regional average: 4 points 4pts Cost is more than 50% higher than the regional average: 0 point 0pts Not applicable N/A 2-EC-4.1: Length of main international railway lines Show details Ratio of the total length of main international railway lines (km) to the total rail network in the country. In Europe, these concern the class-A lines of E-railway network classification listed in Annex I of the European Agreement on Main International Railway Lines (AGC). In Mashreq region, these are listed in Annex I of the Agreement on International Railways in the Arab Mashreq. Ratio ≥ 25%: 10 points 10pts 20% ≤ ratio < 25%: 8 points 8pts 15% ≤ ratio < 20%: 6 points 6pts 10% ≤ ratio < 15%: 4 points 4pts 5% ≤ ratio < 10%: 2 points 2pts ratio < 5%: 0 point 0pts Not applicable N/A 2-EC-4.2: Length of supplementary international railway lines Show details Ratio of the total length of supplementary international railway lines (km) to the total rail network in the country. In Europe, these lines concern the class-B lines of E-railway network classification listed in Annex I of the AGC. Ratio ≥ 25%: 10 points 10pts 20% ≤ ratio < 25%: 8 points 8pts 15% ≤ ratio < 20%: 6 points 6pts 10% ≤ ratio < 15%: 4 points 4pts 5% ≤ ratio < 10%: 2 points 2pts ratio < 5%: 0 point 0pts Not applicable N/A 2-EC-4.3: Number of international railway corridors Show details The number of international railway corridors passing through the country. Not applicable. This is a verification indicator. N/A 2-EC-4.4: Commercial speed of international railway lines Show details The average commercial speed of the majority of the international railway lines along the national segment, which is equal to the distance divided by the journey time. ≥ 160km/h: 10 points 10pts 120 km/h: 8 points 8pts 100km/h: 6 points 6pts 80 km/h: 4 points 4pts 60 km/h: 2 points 2pts 40 km/h: 0 point 0pts Not applicable N/A 2-EC-5.1a: Admission requirements for locomotives Show details Admission requirements for locomotives and powered trains, in terms of the technical condition, based on international/regional/subregional regime. Notes: - “Region” should be defined as a group of countries that are engaged in economic cooperation such as, for example, the Southern African Development Community. - “Subregion” should be defined as a group of adjoining countries. In the case of Georgia for example, subregion should cover Georgia, Turkey, Armenia, Azerbaijan and the Russian Federation. A country may exclude one of several adjoining countries in its assessment when harmonization and integration with those adjoining countries are not applicable due to major barriers such as political tension and border closures. Application of the international convention regime: 10 points 10pts Application of regional regime equivalent to the applicable international conventions: 8 points 8pts Application of an equivalent subregional regime: 6 points 6pts Application of a simplified bilateral regime: 4 points 4pts No admission: 0 point 0pts Not applicable N/A 2-EC-5.1b: Admission requirements for train wagons Show details Admission requirements for train wagons and passenger carriages, in terms of the technical condition, based on international/regional/subregional regime. Notes: - “Region” should be defined as a group of countries that are engaged in economic cooperation such as, for example, the Southern African Development Community. - “Subregion” should be defined as a group of adjoining countries. In the case of Georgia for example, subregion should cover Georgia, Turkey, Armenia, Azerbaijan and the Russian Federation. A country may exclude one of several adjoining countries in its assessment when harmonization and integration with those adjoining countries are not applicable due to major barriers such as political tension and border closures. Application of the international convention regime: 10 points 10pts Application of regional regime equivalent to the applicable international conventions: 8 points 8pts Application of an equivalent subregional regime: 6 points 6pts Application of a simplified bilateral regime: 4 points 4pts No admission: 0 point 0pts Not applicable N/A 2-EC-5.1c: Contract of carriage requirements Show details Level of harmonization of the contract of carriage requirements as per internationally and/or regionally agreed arrangements. Notes: - “Region” should be defined as a group of countries that are engaged in economic cooperation such as, for example, the Southern African Development Community. - “Subregion” should be defined as a group of adjoining countries. In the case of Georgia for example, subregion should cover Georgia, Turkey, Armenia, Azerbaijan and the Russian Federation. A country may exclude one of several adjoining countries in its assessment when harmonization and integration with those adjoining countries are not applicable due to major barriers such as political tension and border closures. - The maximum score of this indicator is 8 points because currently there are no internationally agreed arrangements yet. 10 points are reserved when such agreements become available in the future. Regionally or subregionally harmonized: 8 points 8pts Bilaterally harmonized with common full contract conditions, arrangements for legal issues and consignment note: 6 points 6pts No common arrangements: 0 point 0pts Not applicable N/A 2-EC-5.1d: Recognition of license for train drivers Show details Degree of recognition of license for train drivers. Notes: - “Region” should be defined as a group of countries that are engaged in economic cooperation such as, for example, the Southern African Development Community. - The maximum score of this indicator is 8 points because currently there are no internationally agreed arrangements yet. 10 points are reserved when such agreements become available in the future. Use of regionally recognized license: 8 points 8pts Bilateral arrangement with additional documents: 6 points 6pts No arrangement: 0 point 0pts Not applicable N/A 2-EC-5.2a: Track gauge Show details The extent to which the track gauge of the international rail network in the country adheres to the regional/global technical standards. Notes: - “Region” should be defined as a group of countries that are engaged in economic cooperation such as, for example, the Southern African Development Community. - “Subregion” should be defined as a group of adjoining countries. In the case of Georgia for example, subregion should cover Georgia, Turkey, Armenia, Azerbaijan and the Russian Federation. A country may exclude one of several adjoining countries in its assessment when harmonization and integration with those adjoining countries are not applicable due to major barriers such as political tension and border closures. Track gauge adheres to global technical standards: 10 points 10pts Track gauge adheres to regional technical standards: 8 points 8pts Track gauge adheres to sub-regional technical standards: 6 points 6pts Track gauge adheres to bilaterally agreed technical standards: 4 points 4pts Track gauge adheres to national technical standards: 0 point 0pts Not applicable N/A 2-EC-5.2b: Loading gauge Show details The extent to which the loading gauge of the international rail network in the country adheres to the regional/global technical standards. Notes: - “Region” should be defined as a group of countries that are engaged in economic cooperation such as, for example, the Southern African Development Community. - “Subregion” should be defined as a group of adjoining countries. In the case of Georgia for example, subregion should cover Georgia, Turkey, Armenia, Azerbaijan and the Russian Federation. A country may exclude one of several adjoining countries in its assessment when harmonization and integration with those adjoining countries are not applicable due to major barriers such as political tension and border closures. Loading gauge adheres to global technical standards: 10 points 10pts Loading gauge adheres to regional technical standards: 8 points 8pts Loading gauge adheres to sub-regional technical standards: 6 points 6pts Loading gauge adheres to bilaterally agreed technical standards: 4 points 4pts Loading gauge adheres to national technical standards: 0 point 0pts Not applicable N/A 2-EC-5.2c: Railway signaling system Show details TThe most widely used railway signalling system on the international railway network in the country. Moving-blocks signaling: 10 points 10pts Fixed-blocks signaling: 7 points 7pts Manually-controlled block: 4 points 4pts No signaling system in place: 0 point 0pts Not applicable N/A 2-EC-5.2d: Number of countries whose rolling stocks are allowed to enter the country Show details The number of foreign countries whose rolling stocks are allowed to enter the country. ≥ 5 countries: 10 points 10pts 4 countries: 8 points 8pts 3 countries: 6 points 6pts 2 countries: 4 points 4pts 1 country: 2 points 2pts None: 0 point 0pts Not applicable N/A 2-EC-5.2e: Membership of international rail conventions Show details Degree of harmonization of legal interoperability by being member of international railway conventions to comprehensively address the legal issues of international rail transport across the entire continent. Member of either OSJD or OTIF: 10 points 10pts Not member: 0 point 0pts Not applicable N/A 2-EC-5.2f: Open access Show details Degree of access to third party operators to operate on the country’s railway network. Third party operators are railway operators other than the main national operator Full access with independent rail regulator oversight: 10 points 10pts Full access without oversight: 7 points 7pts Access granted to only adjoining state railways, not to private railway operators: 4 points 4pts Access granted only to the national railway (monopoly): 0 point 0pts Not applicable N/A 2-EC-6.1: Modal share of freight rail transport Show details Ratio of the freight ton kilometres performed with rail transport to the total ton kilometres involved in international journeys per year. ratio ≥ 90%: 10 points 10pts 75% ≤ ratio < 90%: 8 points 8pts 50% ≤ ratio < 75%: 6 points 6pts 25% ≤ ratio < 50%: 4 points 4pts 10% ≤ ratio < 25%: 2 points 2pts ratio < 10%: 0 point 0pts Not applicable N/A 2-EC-6.2: Share of containerized cargo Show details The share of containerization is defined as the gross weight of containerized cargo divided by the total gross weight of non-bulk cargo by rail. Oil, coal, grain, bulk, cement, etc, are excluded. share ≥ 65%: 10 points 10pts 50% ≤ share < 65%: 8 points 8pts 25% ≤ share < 50%: 6 points 6pts 10% ≤ share < 25%: 4 points 4pts share < 10%: 0 point 0pts Not applicable N/A 2-EC-6.3: Handling time of consignments in terminals Show details The minimum handling time of consignments in terminals, defined as the period from the latest time of acceptance of goods to the departure of trains, and from the arrival of trains to the availability of wagons ready for the unloading of loading units. time ≤ 1 hour: 10 points 10pts 2 hours ≤ time < 1 hour: 5 points 5pts time > 2 hours: 0 point 0pts Not applicable N/A 2-EC-6.4: Waiting time for road vehicles Show details The minimum waiting time for road vehicles, defined as the waiting time for road vehicles to deliver or collect loading units at rail terminals. time ≤ 20 minutes: 10 points 10pts 60 minutes ≤ time < 20 minutes: 5 points 5pts time > 60 minutes: 0 point 0pts Not applicable N/A 2-EC-7.1: Implementation of interconnected e-solutions Show details Degree of implementation of internationally, regionally, subregionally or bilaterally harmonized interconnected e-solutions for transport: electronic CIM/SMGS and e-Single Window system for customs and border procedures. Notes: - CIM : Uniform rules concerning the contract of international carriage of goods by rail - SMGS: Agreement on International Freight Traffic by Rail - “Region” should be defined as a group of countries that are engaged in economic cooperation such as, for example, the Southern African Development Community. - “Subregion” should be defined as a group of adjoining countries. In the case of Georgia for example, subregion should cover Georgia, Turkey, Armenia, Azerbaijan and the Russian Federation. A country may exclude one of several adjoining countries in its assessment when harmonization and integration with those adjoining countries are not applicable due to major barriers such as political tension and border closures. electronic CIM/SMGS and inter-agency e-Single Window are implemented: 10 points 10pts Only e-Single Window is implemented: 8 points 8pts electronic CIM/SMGS is implemented, no e-Single Window: 6 points 6pts Use of electronic processing system: 4 points 4pts Manual processing: 0 point 0pts Not applicable N/A 2-EC-7.2: Application of advance electronic rail cargo information Show details Degree of application of advance electronic cargo information for pre-clearance purposes. Full-fledged advance electronic cargo information system allowing for pre-clearance is applicable for all cargo: 10 points 10pts Full-fledged advance electronic cargo information system allowing for pre-clearance is applicable for the majority of cargo: 7 points 7pts Full-fledged advance electronic cargo information system allowing for pre-clearance is applicable for selected cargo only, the majority is processed manually upon arrival: 4 points 4pts No electronic pre-clearance cargo system in place, processing and clearance take place upon arrival of the cargo in the country of importation: 0 point 0pts Not applicable N/A 2-EC-7.3: Availability of detection equipment and inspection technologies Show details Availability of detection equipment, scanning and non-intrusive inspection technologies including scanners for cargo, technology for detection of chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear materials, and e-Seal, at border crossing points (BCPs). Available at all rail BCPs and inland clearance stations: 10 points 10pts Available at least 50% of rail BCPs and inland clearance stations: 7 points 7pts Available at less than 50% of rail BCPs and inland clearance stations: 4 points 4pts Not available in any rail BCPs nor inland clearance stations: 0 point 0pts Not applicable N/A 2-EC-7.4: Coordinated timetabling process Show details The existence of a coordinated timetabling process. Notes: - “Region” should be defined as a group of countries that are engaged in economic cooperation such as, for example, the Southern African Development Community. - “Subregion” should be defined as a group of adjoining countries. In the case of Georgia for example, subregion should cover Georgia, Turkey, Armenia, Azerbaijan and the Russian Federation. A country may exclude one of several adjoining countries in its assessment when harmonization and integration with those adjoining countries are not applicable due to major barriers such as political tension and border closures. Globally coordinated: 10 points 10pts Regionally coordinated: 8 points 8pts Subregionally coordinated: 6 points 6pts Bilaterally coordinated: 4 points 4pts No coordination in place: 0 point 0pts Not applicable N/A Save Rail progress Your changes have not been saved.Save changesDon't saveCancel 2-SO-3.10: Visa extension for seafarers Show details Temporary extension of seafarers' visas stranded due to lockdowns. Extension in place: 10 pts 10pts Not in place: 0 pts 0pts 2-SO-3.11: Exemption from weight control Show details Temporary exemption from weight control for essential goods transport vehicles. Exemption in place: 10 pts 10pts Not in place: 0 pts 0pts 2-SO-3.12: Increase in daily driving limit Show details Temporary increase of maximum daily driving limit to ensure essential deliveries. Regulation in place: 10 pts 10pts Not in place: 0 pts 0pts 2-SO-3.13: Reduction in rest time requirements Show details Temporary reduction of mandatory driver rest times to support logistics. Regulation in place: 10 pts 10pts Not in place: 0 pts 0pts 2-SO-3.14: Communication/information points at BCPs Show details Availability of help points at BCPs for drivers during emergencies. All BCPs: 10 pts 10pts >50%: 7 pts 7pts <50%: 4 pts 4pts None: 0 pts 0pts 2-SO-3.15: Hygienic and sanitary facilities Show details Availability of sanitary infrastructure at BCPs and along roads. All BCPs & roads: 8 pts 8pts Only BCPs: 4 pts 4pts Map: +2 pts 2pts None: 0 pts 0pts 2-SO-3.16: Take-away food shop availability for drivers Show details Access to food shops along international roads for drivers during lockdowns. Measures in place: 8 pts 8pts Map: +2 pts 2pts Not in place: 0 pts 0pts 2-SO-3.17: Medical examination points at BCPs Show details Availability of medical checkpoints at BCPs for health screening. All BCPs: 10 pts 10pts >50%: 7 pts 7pts <50%: 4 pts 4pts None: 0 pts 0pts 2-SO-3.18: Medical certificates for drivers and personnel Show details Requirement of medical certificates for border crossing during pandemics. Required: 10 pts 10pts Not required: 0 pts 0pts 2-SO-3.19: Disinfection of rest and parking areas Show details Routine disinfection of rest and parking areas along international corridors. All areas: 10 pts 10pts >50%: 7 pts 7pts <50%: 4 pts 4pts None: 0 pts 0pts 2-SO-3.1: Protocols to deal with pandemic situation Show details Existence of protocols to expedite movement of goods at border crossing points (BCPs) during pandemics. Protocols in place: 10 pts 10pts No protocols: 0 pts 0pts 2-SO-3.2: List of essential goods Show details Protocols include a prioritized list of essential goods (e.g., healthcare, agricultural products) for cross-border movement. List included in protocols: 10 pts 10pts Not included: 0 pts 0pts 2-SO-3.3: Priority for essential goods Show details Protocols provide for fast-track treatment of trucks carrying essential goods, including health-related supplies. Fast lanes 24/7: 8 pts 8pts Fast lanes limited: 4 pts 4pts Bilateral cooperation: +2 pts 2pts No fast lanes: 0 pts 0pts 2-SO-3.4: Setting up crisis teams Show details Existence of crisis teams to manage and coordinate customs and cross-border tasks during emergencies. Crisis teams in place: 10 pts 10pts Not in place: 0 pts 0pts 2-SO-3.5: Extending BCP opening hours Show details Protocols allow extending BCP operating hours to reduce clearance time and ensure supply chain continuity. Included in protocols: 10 pts 10pts Not included: 0 pts 0pts 2-SO-3.6: Simplified origin confirmation procedure Show details Temporary simplification of country of origin procedures during emergencies. Simplified in place: 8 pts 8pts e-copy/paper accepted: +2 pts 2pts Not in place: 0 pts 0pts 2-SO-3.7: Import duty for healthcare goods Show details Relief or deadline extension of import duty payment for healthcare-related goods. Relief: 8 pts 8pts Extension: 4 pts 4pts Penalty abolition: +2 pts 2pts Not in place: 0 pts 0pts 2-SO-3.8: Temporary certificate validity extension Show details Temporary extension of validity for transport-related certificates during pandemics. Extension in place: 10 pts 10pts Not in place: 0 pts 0pts 2-SO-3.9: Driving license validity extension Show details Temporary extension of validity for driving licenses of transport operators. Extension in place: 10 pts 10pts Not in place: 0 pts 0pts 2-SO-4.1: Intelligent traffic management during emergencies Show details Use of ICT and electronic signaling to manage traffic in real-time under hazard conditions. In protocols: 10 pts 10pts In place only: 5 pts 5pts Not in place: 0 pts 0pts 2-SO-4.2: Redundancy of international road networks Show details Proportion of BCPs accessible via multiple independent routes to reduce vulnerability. TESTING ≥75%: 10 pts 10pts 50–74%: 7 pts 7pts 25–49%: 4 pts 4pts <25%: 0 pts 0pts 2-SO-1.1: Percentage of international railway lines with at least two tracks Show details Ratio of the international railway lines along the national segment with at least two tracks, to the total length of the international railway lines along the national segment. ratio ≥ 25%: 10 points 10pts 20% ≤ ratio < 25%: 8 points 8pts 15% ≤ ratio < 20%: 6 points 6pts 10% ≤ ratio < 15%: 4 points 4pts 5% ≤ ratio < 10%: 2 points 2pts ratio < 5%: 0 point 0pts Not applicable N/A 2-SO-1.2a: Secured sidings at rail BCPs (cargo security) Show details The extent to which the rail border crossing points (BCPs) in the country are equipped with secured sidings - fully fenced and illuminated - in order to reduce cargo thefts. All rail BCPs are equipped with secured sidings: 10 points 10pts More than 50% of rail BCPs are equipped with secured sidings: 7 points 7pts Less than 50% of rail BCPs are equipped with secured sidings: 4 points 4pts No BCP is equipped with secured sidings: 0 point 0pts Not applicable N/A 2-SO-1.2b: Number of incidents of rail cargo theft Show details The number of cases of reported rail cargo theft per 100,000 wagon days involved in trade (import and export) per year. Not applicable. This is a verification indicator. N/A 2-SO-1.2c: Level crossings on international lines Show details The most widely used type of level crossings on the international railway lines in the country. No road level crossings: 10 points 10pts Automated level crossing system: 7 points 7pts Manned level crossings: 4 points 4pts Unmanned level crossings: 0 point 0pts Not applicable N/A 2-SO-1.2d: Number of accidents at level crossings Show details The number of accidents at level crossings per 100,000 train-kms driven per year. Not applicable. This is a verification indicator. N/A 2-SO-1.2e: Secured sidings of operating railway lines Show details The extent to which secured sidings - fully fenced and illuminated - are installed on both sides of the operating international railway lines in the country in order to increase traffic safety. All operating railway lines are equipped with secured sidings: 10 points 10pts More than 50% of operating railway lines are equipped with secured sidings: 7 points 7pts Less than 50% of operating railway lines are equipped with secured sidings: 4 points 4pts No railway line is equipped with secured sidings: 0 point 0pts Not applicable N/A 2-SO-1.3: Number of accidents due to system failure Show details The number of accidents per 100,000 train-kms driven per year, where primary cause is system failure, such as broken rails, track buckles, signals passed at danger, wrong-side signalling failures, broken wheels and broken axles. Not applicable. This is a verification indicator. N/A 2-SO-2.1a: Placarding and marking of wagons Show details Degree of harmonization of internationally/regionally agreed provisions on placarding and marking in the national laws and legislations. It concerns placarding and marking of all types of wagons for the transport of dangerous goods. Notes: - “Region” should be defined as a group of countries that are engaged in economic cooperation such as, for example, the Southern African Development Community. In accordance with internationally agreed provisions: 10 points 10pts In accordance with regionally agreed provisions: 5 points 5pts Not recognizing international/regional provisions or no national law applied: 0 point 0pts Not applicable N/A 2-SO-2.1b: Percentage of transport of dangerous goods Show details Percentage of traffic classified as transport of dangerous goods on the international rail network. Not applicable. This is a verification indicator. N/A 2-SO-2.2a: Provision of function-specific training Show details Degree of harmonization of internationally/regionally agreed rules in the provision of function-specific training for carrier's and railway infrastructure manager's personnel involved in the transport of dangerous goods. The internationally agreed elements of function-specific training are set out in RID (International Carriage of Dangerous Goods by Rail). Notes: - “Region” should be defined as a group of countries that are engaged in economic cooperation such as, for example, the Southern African Development Community The provision is developed based on internationally agreed rules: 10 points 10pts The provision is developed based on regionally agreed rules: 5 points 5pts The provision is developed partially based on internationally/regionally agreed rules: 3 points 3pts The provision does not recognize internationally/regionally agreed rules or no training provisions in place: 0 point 0pts Not applicable N/A 2-SO-2.3a: Provisions for trains transporting dangerous goods Show details The number of accidents and incidents involving transport of dangerous goods by rail per 100,000 train-kms driven per year. Mandatory: 10 points 10pts Voluntary: 5 points 5pts Non-existing: 0 point 0pts Not applicable N/A 2-SO-2.3b: Number of accidents and incidents involving transport of dangerous goods Show details The number of accidents and incidents involving transport of dangerous goods by rail per 100,000 train-kms driven per year. Not applicable. This is a verification indicator. N/A Save Rail progress Your changes have not been saved.Save changesDon't saveCancel 2-EV-3.1: Alternative deviation routes Show details The number of possible existing alternative ways to deviate vehicles reduces the consequences of an infrastructure asset being out of service. multiple alternative ways – 10 points 10pts one alternative way – 7 points 7pts no alternative ways – 0 points 0pts 2-EV-3.2: Modal substitution possibility Show details The possibility of using another transport means to satisfy transport demand reduces the consequences of an infrastructure asset being out of service. multiple alternative means – 10 points 10pts one alternative means – 7 points 7pts no alternative means – 0 points 0pts 2-EV-3.3: Temporary route feasibility Show details The possibility of providing a temporary alternative route for vehicles reduces the consequences on infrastructure users. multiple alternative paths – 10 points 10pts one alternative path – 7 points 7pts no alternative path – 0 points 0pts 2-EV-3.4: Shutdown and warning systems Show details The presence of a safe shutdown or warning system that prevents users from accessing or enables them to bypass a damaged road section helps reduce the consequences of a climate hazard. multiple safe shutdown or warning systems – 10 points 10pts one safe shutdown or warning system – 5 points 5pts no safe shutdown or warning system – 0 points 0pts 2-EV-3.5: Emergency and evacuation paths Show details The presence of emergency/evacuation paths allows users to escape in case of danger, which reduces the consequence of a climate hazard (specific). multiple emergency paths – 10 points 10pts one emergency path – 6 points 6pts no emergency path – 0 points 0pts 2-EV-3.6: Deployable protection equipment Show details The presence of temporary solutions for installing protection barriers/equipment prevents the infrastructure from being affected by a climate hazard (relevant to landslide or flooding hazards). adequate protection – 10 points 10pts no protection – 0 points 0pts 2-EV-4.1: Condition of infrastructure Show details The condition of the transport infrastructure exposed to hazard extremely unlikely – 10 points 10pts very unlikely – 9 points 9pts unlikely – 7 points 7pts moderately likely – 3 points 3pts highly likely to collapse – 0 points 0pts 2-EV-4.2: Condition of protection systems Show details The condition of protection barriers/equipment extremely unlikely – 10 points 10pts very unlikely – 9 points 9pts unlikely – 7 points 7pts moderately likely – 3 points 3pts highly likely to collapse – 0 points 0pts 2-EV-4.3: Post-hazard infrastructure state Show details The expected condition of transport infrastructure after a specific climate hazard in service, no repairs needed – 10 points 10pts in service, but repairs needed – 7 points 7pts requires rebuild – 3 points 3pts out of service – 0 points 0pts 2-EV-4.4: Post-hazard protection state Show details The expected condition of the protection barriers/equipment after a landslide in service, no repairs needed – 10 points 10pts in service, but repairs needed – 7 points 7pts requires rebuild – 3 points 3pts out of service – 0 points 0pts 2-EV-5.1: Restoration accessibility Show details The accessibility of the infrastructure affects the ability and time required to restore it without equipment – 10 points 10pts with steps – 5 points 5pts telescopic crane – 0 points 0pts 2-EV-5.2: Historical damage extent Show details The extent of past damages due to climate hazards minor/ aesthetic – 10 points 10pts serious damage – 2 points 2pts collapse – 0 points 0pts 2-EV-5.3: Historical hazard frequency Show details The frequency of past climate hazards >15 years – 10 points 10pts 15 years – 7 points 7pts 1–5 years – 3 points 3pts <1 year – 0 points 0pts 2-EV-5.4: Future hazard frequency Show details The expected frequency of future climate hazards >15 years – 10 points 10pts 15 years – 7 points 7pts 1–5 years – 3 points 3pts <1 year – 0 points 0pts 2-EV-5.5: Future hazard severity Show details The expected severity of future climate hazards strong decrease – 10 points 10pts soft decrease – 7 points 7pts soft increase – 5 points 5pts strong increase – 0 points 0pts 2-EV-5.6: Emergency and evacuation paths Show details The extent of vegetation affecting the likelihood of future hazards (e.g. flooding, landslides) and the probability of restoration interventions/ service interruptions dense – 10 points 10pts middle – 7 points 7pts light – 5 points 5pts limited – 0 points 0pts 2-EV-5.7: Traffic volume Show details The amount of traffic affects the consequences of a climate hazard <20% of capacity – 10 points 10pts 20–50% of capacity – 5 points 5pts 50–80% of capacity – 2 points 2pts >80% of capacity – 0 points 0pts 2-EV-5.8: Dangerous goods traffic Show details The amount of dangerous goods traffic None – 10 points 10pts Rare – 7 points 7pts Frequent – 2 points 2pts 2-EV-6.1: Restoration budget availability Show details The budget availability for restoration affects speed of restoration Enough for ≥100% of the interventions – 10 points 10pts Enough for 50–99% of interventions – 7 points 7pts Enough for <50% of interventions – 0 points 0pts 2-EV-7.1: Monitoring strategy presence Show details The presence of a monitoring strategy raises the awareness of the state of the infrastructure asset and is likely to increase preparedness to react when necessary Constant – 10 points 10pts Periodic – 7 points 7pts None – 0 points 0pts 2-EV-7.2: Maintenance strategy presence Show details The presence of a maintenance strategy increases the likelihood that a transport infrastructure asset will be in a condition to resist a climate hazard Preventive interventions conducted – 10 points 10pts Only responsive interventions – 5 points 5pts None – 0 points 0pts 2-EV-7.3: Pre-hazard interventions Show details The extent of interventions executed prior to the climate hazard affects the likelihood that the transport infrastructure asset will be in a condition to resist a landslide >80% of the benchmark budget – 10 points 10pts 50–80% of the benchmark budget – 5 points 5pts <50% of the benchmark budget – 0 points 0pts 2-EV-8.1: Emergency plan presence Show details The presence of an emergency plan Operative plan (with tasks, resources, etc.) – 10 points 10pts Generic plan – 5 points 5pts No plan – 0 points 0pts 2-EV-8.2: Emergency plan practice Show details The practicing of the emergency plan every 6 months – 10 points 10pts yearly – 8 points 8pts every 2 years – 5 points 5pts >2 yrs – 3 points 3pts no exercise – 0 points 0pts 2-EV-1.1: Average age of rolling stocks Show details The average age of rolling stock involved in international transport. age < 15 years: 10 points 10pts 15 years ≤ age < 20 years: 7 points 7pts 20 years ≤ age < 25 years: 4 points 4pts age ≥ 25 years: 0 point 0pts Not applicable N/A 2-EV-1.2: Average age of locomotives Show details The average age of locomotives involved in international transport. age < 15 years: 10 points 10pts 15 years ≤ age < 20 years: 7 points 7pts 20 years ≤ age < 25 years: 4 points 4pts age ≥ 25 years: 0 point 0pts Not applicable N/A 2-EV-1.3: Number of hydrogen-powered train Show details Ratio of the number of hydrogen-powered train involved in international transport, to the total number of trains involved in international transport in the country per year. ratio ≥ 10%: 10 points 10pts 8% ≤ ratio < 10%: 8 points 8pts 6% ≤ ratio < 8%: 6 points 6pts 4% ≤ ratio < 6%: 4 points 4pts 2% ≤ ratio < 4%: 2 points 2pts ratio < 2%: 0 point 0pts Not applicable N/A 2-EV-2.1: Modal share of passenger rail transport Show details Ratio of the passenger kilometres performed with rail transport modes to the total passenger kilometres involved in international journeys per year. ratio ≥ 90%: 10 points 10pts 75% ≤ ratio < 90%: 8 points 8pts 50% ≤ ratio < 75%: 6 points 6pts 25% ≤ ratio < 50%: 4 points 4pts 10% ≤ ratio < 25%: 2 points 2pts ratio < 10%: 0 point 0pts Not applicable N/A 2-EV-2.2: Implementation of technical adaptation measures in rail transport Show details Degree of implementation of technical adaptation measures for rail to project climate change impacts on rail transport system and to propose adaptation options. Some examples of technical adaptation measures for rail are greater resilience of the network to heavy precipitation, and installation of monitoring systems consisting of various environmental and engineering sensors (anemometers) along rail lines. Measures have been implemented: 10 points 10pts Measures are currently being developed: 7 points 7pts Measures are planned to be developed: 4 points 4pts No measures planned to be developed: 0 point 0pts Not applicable N/A Save Rail progress Your changes have not been saved.Save changesDon't saveCancel